• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • NFL
    • Super Bowl Odds and Predictions
  • NBA
  • MLB
  • Soccer/Football
  • NCAAB
  • NHL
  • NCAAF
  • MMA
  • Other Sports
    • Auto racing
    • Esports
    • Golf
    • Horse Racing
    • Tennis
  • Sports Betting Systems
    • NFL Betting Systems
    • NBA Betting Systems
    • MLB Betting Systems
    • NCAAB Betting Systems
    • NCAAF Betting Systems
    • EPL Betting Systems
    • NHL Betting Systems
    • CFL Betting Systems
    • WNBA Betting Systems

WagerBop

Sports News, Strategy, Tips, and Results

  • The WagerBop News Team
  • Contact

The NFL is a Week-to-Week League: Should I Bet Teams Following a Win?

December 12, 2018 By Kreighton R Leave a Comment

I am a firm believer that momentum does not carry over in the NFL. Thursday games can be different, but 6 days off between matchups normally creates a clean slate.

If momentum did exist in the NFL, we would expect to see things like an increased chance of winning after a win and an increased chance of losing after a loss. I am going to dig up some numbers that will finally help put this myth to rest and answer the question: does momentum exist in the NFL?

Results Following a Win

I love looking at trends based on previous outcome. It fascinates me. I wanted to begin by looking at how NFL teams typically perform following a win the previous week. I will explore both the ATS and SU win percentages to see if “hot teams” can give us some sort of advantage.

Year ATS % SU % Avg Line
2018 52.5% 55.9% -1.2
2017 47.8% 54.2% -1.7
2016 51.3% 55.7% -1.1
2015 53.0% 55.4% -1.0
2014 47.9% 52.9% -1.4
2013 47.6% 53.6% -1.3
2012 48.9% 55.0% -1.5
2011 50.6% 57.5% -1.8
2010 47.9% 49.2% -0.7
2009 51.9% 57.1% -1.8
Total 49.9% 54.6% -1.3

Here are my takeaways from this table. First, there is absolutely no trend in ATS win percentage. It is right around 50% each year. If momentum does exist in ATS numbers, the books must compensate for it perfectly because there is no advantage to be gained by betting a team to cover who has just won.

Second, just because the SU win percentage following a win is greater than 50% does not mean momentum exists. With an average line of -1.3, these teams need to win about 54.5% of their games to break even. The 10-year SU win rate of 54.6% with a -1.3 line is trivially profitable.

Think about it from a logical angle as well. Good teams who have winning records are going to be following up a win much more often than poor teams with losing records. Thus, our sample of teams following a win is comprised of mostly winning teams, who you would already expect to have a decent win percentage.

Let’s break it down. This sample included 2,424 games, or about 242 per year (games in which both teams won previously are counted twice because each team is following up a win). Of those games, the team was a winning team in 1,703 of them, or 70.3%. That means a losing team (or a .500 team) was following up a win only 721 times, or 29.7%.

Results Following a Win – Sorted by Record

To better search for the existence of momentum, we need to break down post-win performances by record. I decided to divide teams into three categories: bad teams (less than 40% win percentage), decent teams (40-60% win percentage), or great teams (greater than 60% win percentage).

One last note – I think this search should not begin until Week 5 of each season. Here is why: just because a team is 1-0 does not mean they are “great”. At 3-1, however, I would give them that distinction. Waiting until Week 5 will better divide the three levels of teams and give more accurate results.

Bad Teams Following a Win

Year ATS % SU % Avg Line
2018 60.0% 52.9% 2.5
2017 66.7% 58.8% 2.8
2016 68.8% 47.1% 2.4
2015 48.5% 36.4% 3.1
2014 40.9% 31.8% 4.9
2013 44.4% 37.0% 3.2
2012 38.1% 38.1% 1.9
2011 48.3% 40.0% 2.4
2010 48.6% 34.3% 2.9
2009 59.3% 42.9% 5.5
Total 50.8% 40.5% 3.2

Here is how those bad teams with a win percentage less than 40% have fared after they managed to win a game. That 50.8% ATS win percentage for bad teams following a win is actually slightly better than the 49.9% mark for all teams following a win, but it still is not a profitable win rate.

The 54.6% SU win rate for all teams following a win is right at the break-even point, considering the -1.3 average line. Well, the same thing occurs when we look only at the bad teams. With an average line of +3.2, we can expect the moneyline odds to be right around +140.

With that line, teams would need to win at a rate somewhere between 41% and 42% to break even. As you can see, the “bad teams following a win” SU win percentage is 40.5%, slightly lower than what they need to profit.

Decent Teams Following a Win

Year ATS % SU % Avg Line
2018 63.8% 57.6% -0.5
2017 47.4% 48.8% 0
2016 48.7% 53.2% -1
2015 57.1% 47.6% 0.7
2014 50.8% 48.3% -1.2
2013 46.8% 51.3% 0
2012 57.5% 56.6% -0.4
2011 54.4% 60.7% -0.6
2010 45.5% 42.1% 0.4
2009 43.9% 50.0% -1.3
Total 51.5% 51.6% -0.4

There is a small increase in ATS win percentage once again, but 51.5% on spreads is still not high enough to be profitable. With an average line of -0.4, teams would have to win SU about 53-55% of the time to be profitable on the moneyline.

We have seen similar stories throughout. So far, none of the win percentages we have seen are profitable. Maybe only the great teams are capable of building momentum. Let’s find out.

Great Teams Following a Win

Year ATS % SU % Avg Line
2018 47.8% 60.9% -3.6
2017 47.9% 63.5% -4.1
2016 51.1% 60.2% -2.2
2015 51.4% 70.5% -4.6
2014 47.7% 61.3% -2.8
2013 47.0% 60.0% -4
2012 48.8% 65.1% -4
2011 48.0% 62.4% -4.1
2010 50.5% 59.2% -2.7
2009 53.7% 66.0% -4.2
Total 49.4% 62.8% -3.6

The ATS win percentage is not profitable. 62.8% on SU bets looks pretty good, right? It seems high until you realize that the average line is -3.6. The moneyline for these bets is about -186 which means the break-even win percentage is just over 65%. These great teams could only manage 62.8% which means they would not be profitable on the moneyline.

So far, no luck finding signs of momentum.

Results for 1, 1.5, and 2-Point Favorites

Since the average line over the past 10 years for teams following wins has been -1.3, we should take a look at how ALL teams with this line have fared over that span and then compare. This presents a tricky challenge because no team is ever 1.3-point favorites. I am going to tackle this by looking at 1, 1.5, and 2-point favorites since 2009.

Here is a table illustrating how teams off a loss have fared as 1, 1.5, or 2-point favorites since 2009.

Year ATS % SU % Avg Line
2018 27.3% 27.3% -1.3
2017 38.5% 38.5% -1.5
2016 81.8% 81.8% -1.4
2015 42.1% 50.0% -1.6
2014 38.5% 38.5% -1.6
2013 58.3% 58.3% -1.5
2012 41.2% 41.2% -1.4
2011 40.0% 45.5% -1.5
2010 58.8% 61.1% -1.6
2009 44.4% 55.6% -1.7
Total 47.0% 49.6% -1.5

As you can see, these teams are bad bets. It might just be a bad decade for small favorites, though. So far, we do not have enough evidence to make a definitive statement as to whether momentum exists in the NFL. We need to look at teams favored by the same amounts who have just won.

Here is one more table. This is the exact same search, except this time we are looking at 1, 1.5, and 2-point favorites following a WIN, instead of a loss. Take a look.

Year ATS % SU % Avg Line
2018 36.4% 40.0% -1.3
2017 33.3% 37.5% -1.7
2016 50.0% 57.1% -1.5
2015 64.3% 64.3% -1.9
2014 65.0% 70.0% -1.5
2013 34.8% 34.8% -1.5
2012 44.4% 47.4% -1.6
2011 47.1% 61.1% -1.6
2010 53.3% 53.3% -1.7
2009 60.0% 60.0% -1.4
Total 48.8% 52.4% -1.6

Slightly better, but still not profitable. I have to say that we have found absolutely no evidence of momentum yet.

Verdict: Does Momentum Exist?

What did we find?

  • Teams following a win are not profitable ATS or SU
  • Bad teams are not profitable following a win ATS or SU
  • Decent teams are not profitable following a win ATS or SU
  • Great teams are not profitable following a win ATS or SU
  • Teams valued by Vegas at -1.3 are not profitable, regardless of if they are following a win or loss

If momentum does exist, Vegas compensates for it perfectly because there is no edge to be gained either ATS or SU. The NFL really is a week-to-week league. In a future article, I will explore if it is worth betting or fading teams following a loss.

Kreighton R
Kreighton R

Kreighton loves sports, math, writing, and winning — he combines all of them as a writer for WagerBop. His favorite sports to review are MLB, NFL, NBA, NCAAF, and NCAABB.

Twitter: @WagerBop
Email: kreighton@wagerbop.com
Share1
Tweet
Share
1 Shares

Filed Under: NFL, Sports Betting Tagged With: against the spread, ATS, National Football League, NFL, straight up, SU

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

We Are Social

MLB Daily Double

Sign up

Sign Up

Sign up

Authors For This Section

Georgie L

Georgie has been in the industry for over 11 years, working as a trader and a broker for some of the largest syndicates in the world. Georgie has focused his model development on international soccer leagues.

Twitter: @WagerBop
Email: georgie@wagerbop.com

Jake Nichols

Jake is a mixed martial arts reporter from Australia. At WagerBop, he merges his appreciation of combat sports and a strong passion for analytics to uncover opportunities for readers.

Twitter: @JakeNicholsMMA
Email: jake@wagerbop.com

Jay Sanin

Jay is a sports writer who has been featured on Deadspin, BetAdvisor. In addition to penning wager previews and features, Jay has broadcasted for MAAC school as well as ESPN Radio's Northeastern Affiliates.

Instagram: @jaysanin
Email: jay@wagerbop.com

Nikola Velickovic

Nikola Velickovic is a sports journalist who loves to write and read on all sports. Nikola contributes both news updates and functions as a sports breaking news writer at WagerBop.
Twitter:
Email: nikola@wagerbop.com

Kreighton R

Kreighton loves sports, math, writing, and winning -- he combines all of them as a writer for WagerBop. His favorite sports to review are MLB, NFL, NBA, NCAAF, and NCAABB.

Twitter: @WagerBop
Email: kreighton@wagerbop.com

Kurt Boyer

Kurt has authored close to 1000 stories covering football, soccer, basketball, baseball, ice hockey, prize-fighting and the Olympic Games. Kurt posted a 61% win rate on 200+ college and NFL gridiron picks last season. He muses about High School football on social media as The Gridiron Geek.
Twitter: @scorethepuck
Email: kurt@wagerbop.com

Shehryar Raza

Shehryar is a professional eSports analyst with a particular affinity for CS:GO, LoL, and DOTA. He covers major eSports events across the world for WagerBop.

Twitter: @raza_shehryar
Email: shehryar@wagerbop.com

Oscar Cantu

Oscar is a rabid sports fan who started to develop his own models when he realized that lots of sports betting "experts" rely too much on their own opinions and publicly available information to provide picks. Oscar focuses on football, basketball, and soccer.

Twitter: @WagerBop
Email: social@wagerbop.com

derek

WagerBop Authors

Latest

UEFA Champions League Group Stage Draw Completed

August 31, 2023 By Nikola Velickovic Leave a Comment

MLS: LA FC vs. Inter Miami Preview, Odds, Predictions, Picks

August 31, 2023 By Nikola Velickovic Leave a Comment

Serie A: Napoli vs. Lazio Preview, Odds, Prediction, Picks

August 30, 2023 By Nikola Velickovic Leave a Comment

Bundesliga: Borussia Monchengladbach vs. Bayern Munich Preview, Odds, Prediction, Picks

August 30, 2023 By Nikola Velickovic Leave a Comment

Premeir League: Arsenal vs. Manchester United Preview, Odds, Prediction, Picks

August 29, 2023 By Nikola Velickovic Leave a Comment

Categories

  • Auto racing
  • Boxing
  • College Football
  • Esports
  • EuroLeague
  • FBS
  • FIFA
  • General Strategy
  • Golf
  • Horse Racing
  • Men's Ice Hockey
  • MLB
  • MMA
  • NBA
  • NCAAB
  • NCAAF
  • NFL
  • NHL
  • Olympics
  • Soccer/Football
  • Sports Betting
  • Sports News
  • Sportsbook Reviews
  • Tennis
  • US Soccer
  • Women's Ice Hockey

Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

Footer

About WagerBop

WagerBop is a sports website committed to journalism. We are founded by sports fans — for sports fans — and aim to provide the latest happenings in athletics across the board. We are a team of real, dedicated, eccentric people who aim to deliver the high level of objectivity and quality found throughout our site.

CONTACT DETAILS

Address: 3505 Olsen Blvd
Amarillo, TX 79109
Phone: 806-355-7200
Email Id: admin@wagerbop.com

FREE BETTING STRATEGIES

Free NFL Betting Strategy
Free NCAAF Betting Strategy
Free MLB Betting Strategy
Free NHL Betting Strategy
Free NBA Betting Strategy
Free NCAAB Betting Strategy
Free CFL Betting Strategy
Free EPL Betting Strategy
Free WNBA Betting Strategy

Other Pages

  • Cookie Agreement
  • Editorial Policy
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Wagerbop.com · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Close